

and there is nothing that we can do about it. Thats y every other day a munni gets badnaam or a shiela gets jawaan. forget and move on to some new discussion or some new controversy. some hype was created and then everybody forgot… so this is not something new to happen. when a hippie played by zeenat aman connected it wid smoking marijuana or bongs. the name of “hare krishna hare ram” was tainted in 1971 only. but if we talk about this particular example that you have taken. i agree with you in saying that after every few days a line is crossed in making movies or songs a lil more raunchier.

I am looking forward to hear your views about it. Reasons were given, that it depicts the words from a dancer and would audience expects a bar dancer type woman singing soft songs in front of a terrorist.įew more songs that should be passed with “Adult only certificate” are Long back in 1986 Madhuri’s item number create such sensation – Choli ki peeche from Khalnayak. Seducing can be just like expressing any other emotions but no excuses for cheap. But please understand there is a difference in being seducing and cheap. Guilt because it reflects the mental state of society. They are not pleasing rather give pain to ears and guilt.

What censor board is doing? Songs like Mit jaye gum should be passed with Adult Certificate only.
#Dum maro dum song copy full#
Now a full song is released full of vulgarity. If advertisements can be banned, then why not these cheap/crap/raunchy songs can be? Controversy was created on a word from Aaja Nachley ,2009. We have moral police pressing siren for leading lady dressing in movies or few sensuous scenes or at times for complete movie, but why not for songs. Yes with the popular original melodious chanting “hare Krishna hare Rama” words are raunchy and if you by mistake happen to listen it with family or even your younger siblings they are humiliating. Play the song beats are awesome, catchy and shocking lyrics. I am talking about the much hyped and played Deepika’s item number – Mit Jaye gum (Dum Maro Dum). For movies it’s ok, we have certifications but what about songs ? Hopefully, in Bodyguard too I'll have a positive role,' said Manjrekar.This is a shortcut that entertainment industry is practicing these days to attract mass – immense hype. It was becoming tough for my 17-year-old son to explain to his friends why his father was always playing leery characters. 'When I landed there I realised I had a positive role in Ready. Even in Dabangg, he was cast as Sonakshi Sinha's father.įor Anees Bazmi's Ready too, Manjrekar was not told what his role was until he arrived on location in Colombo. I don't get a chance to direct him at all,' said Manjrekar who directed films like Vaastav and Astitva.Įver since Manjrekar appeared as the main villain in Wanted, Salman considers Manjrekar as his good luck mascot. I think Salman prefers me to be an actor. I never ask him about my role because I know he's asking me with a good role in mind. 'He hasn't told me what I play in Bodyguard. The funniest part of Salman's film offer is that Manjrekar is clueless about what he's supposed to play. Now Manjrekar has to join the Bodyguard team from April 3. 'You're in Bodyguard, he told Manjrekar, who has been angling to get Salman to listen to his script for a film that he has been meaning to direct with the star in the lead for a year now. It is therefore no surprise to know that he rang up Mahesh Manjrekar recently with an offer that the director-actor couldn't refuse.

Salman Khan is known to ask people close to him to do the oddest of things at the oddest hours.
